Your team can generate more code. Who’s going to review it?
For engineering managers
- Your product’s connection
- Your product sorts pull requests by risk. That gives a team a practical way to decide what deserves a human reviewer’s attention first.
- The argument to develop
- Use the launch to examine what happens after code generation. Walk through a growing review queue, explain the cost of treating every change equally, and show how risk-based review changes the order of work.
Evidence to add before publishing
Use a real pull request to demonstrate the risk signals. Don’t claim faster reviews without measured evidence.
